67 Comments
User's avatar
Chapter2's avatar

Brilliant insights. This deserves way more eyes than just Substack.

RBAR's avatar

Fiduciaries like Vanguard have supported these changes? Passive ETF holders are pigeons? I will cc Vanguard.

Todd Traut's avatar

It can be argued that DC is filled with many politicians and a bureaucratic state that does not allow “American Exceptionalism” take over. Sorry, just exposing my Gen X thoughts.

Debra Douglas's avatar

I’m reading this and trying to not pay attention to a news clip about states restricting what SNAP recipients can eat. Elon should permanently relocate to his beloved Mars. Humans are increasingly losing currency. I’m beginning to find the movie Armageddon comforting.

T.C.'s avatar
Feb 9Edited

If I recall correctly, there have always been restrictions on what could be purchased with food stamps. Couldn't buy alcohol of any kind. You couldn't buy soda, but you could buy apple juice with twice the sugar in it as soda. (Hell, you could buy Hawaiian Punch). You couldn't buy potato chips, or popcorn, but you could buy pretzels. (Or maybe I have that backwards, anyway, one of them was considered a frivolous snack and one of them was considered "real food")

Yuki's avatar

Do you think they would be interested in hearing from a foreign national? 😲😏

Michael W. Green's avatar

Absolutely. This is a private institution.

Yuki's avatar

Fine, then. I did it.

I changed a (very) few words, and some formatting, just in case they are not too lazy to compare the intake, and thus discover that this is a (semi-) organized effort. 😏

TehYellowDart's avatar

I haven't encountered these details about the Business Plot. Is there a book you recommend on the subject?

Michael W. Green's avatar

I’d start with Archer’s “The Plot to Steal the Whitehouse”

Tom Brady's avatar

The more I learn about American history the more shocking it becomes. I just ordered the book.

Flygal's avatar

Ok I sent the email

ROB LORD's avatar

My email sent. Thank you Mike.

patrick gallagher's avatar

another thought provoking piece, mike. i have been meaning to subscribe for some time and your recent discussion with rupert and benny reminded me….

thanks

July Yang's avatar

Fascinating read as always, Michael.

Sent the Nasdaq email - I do wonder if the changes proposed would increase collectible tax revenue in the direction that our balance sheet requires. At any rate, not a productive, sustainable way to go about it.

Max Eddy's avatar

Sent. Thanks Mike!

Jonah Gaines's avatar

Email sent to Nasdaq index consultations!

Eddie Bowie's avatar

Great thing to point out. I was also focused on the spending side but maybe because I have very little confidence that the government would do anything worthwhile if they got the 13%.

You have convinced me we need to fix the tax code. The simple guiding principle should be to incentivize production and penalize rent seeking activities “passive cash flows”. In other words, incentivize actual work. I know, bummer.

Chronos's avatar

Get rid of income tax. Tax land outside of primary residence. Two of my suggestions for reform.

Eddie Bowie's avatar

I like getting rid of W2 income tax and shifting to a consumption tax of sorts. You incentivize work and incentive where and where not to spend money.

Andrew Chang's avatar

Hmmm thought provoking piece. An interesting comment on books like The Dictators Handbook which suggest that at the limit, more authoritarian forms of government don’t differ much from representative governments. Both will select winners and losers, but do so in different ways (with the representative government doing so in ways more palatable for our modern Christian sensibilities).

On the debt jubilee, all 3 options involve picking winners they just do so in different currencies. Mussolini and Hitler options obviously enrich (bail out) creditor insiders at the expense of the outsiders explicitly. Roosevelt’s option costs the general public to help the general class of creditor: depreciate the debt, add liquidity, generalize the consequences. Roosevelt probably had his favorite creditors but largely all the creditors could benefit.

Similarly, leaky tax codes (or “complex” tax codes) are the currency that democracies use to enrich insiders. Rather than enrich insiders explicitly they can use taxes and subsidies to help insiders (both sides of the expense/revenue spectrum), but like above a lot of these tax codes can and will be exploited by the general public (read the rich). The existence of these exploits is the cost of keeping a permanent political class in power.

But the I believe that gestures do matter to preserve the System so we do not need to rely on a Manager. We need another Roosevelt that can preserve the currency of the political class (leaky legislation) while preserving the faith in the System. A tall order indeed.

ratch's avatar

Great post. A tip on the Nasdaq email - if you placed it below the paywall, fewer people will see it and thus harder to get to 50,000 :)

I'm about to go send mine; with some adjustments for the litigation exposure they might subsequently face if they change the rules timed for a few specific IPOs.

the long warred's avatar

Elon IPO; The IPO as proposed is Escape Velocity of Future minded Elites to deny more Blue D minded elites financial control by pouring in 401K and pension money.

The IPO as proposed checks the 401Ks institutional investors by shutting them out for 15 days. That means we don't have Blue Globalist Finance taking Space-X hostage, and X-AI hostage, which means Space-X/and X(Twitter) have just escaped the Blue Legacy Gravitational Field.

It means the old Blue Boomer model is being priced out, sort of a Financial Zoning Law.

This IPO as proposed is escape velocity, it is Orbit, and whatever Blue Political agenda and narrative censorship/ Blue looting, Blue killing of AI , X/Twitter censorship that was done in the past is priced out.

Recall that Biden told Marc Andreessen to his face AI would be a controlled technology, with the legal precedent of nuclear physics being controlled after the Atomic Bomb was invented.

This was motive for tech to jump from Dem to Trump. Elon again leads the way.

The effect of this IPO as proposed is to allow a group of insiders to shield AI technology (math), Space Commercialization and Free Speech on X-Twitter to not be taken hostage by Blue Minded Institutional investors.

Michael W. Green's avatar

I’m sorry, I’m going to refund your subscription. You are clearly not getting the value out of it to justify the expense. In exchange, I ask you to stop posting in the comments.