Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Taylor's avatar

I’m really glad to see people fighting for our futures once again.

I got excited about nuclear power as an undergrad in Mechanical Engineering, then went on to the Nuclear Navy. It seemed optimistic with 3 nuclear plants being built in the early Bush years.

Then the powers that be decided to sabotage all of those projects and destroy a significant part of our nuclear power infrastructure. It was very disheartening.

The fraud within the “Green” movements from wasteful spending to infrastructure sabotage to blatant environmental damage is simply frightening. It’s as if all of these agencies were infiltrated with enemy spies, like the Soviets used to attempt within our biggest labor unions.

Sentiment has markedly turned in most countries since the energy crisis in 2022, but our leaders are absolutely dragging their feet.

Expand full comment
Dagny's avatar

Excellent summation of a complicated, long term issue. I have said in several places, "It's fossil fuel + nuclear + some solar where this is BTU positive; or subsistence agriculture". Choose. Me, I garden but am not interested in subsistence ag!

One very important issue not addressed in your piece is safety of nuclear plants. We need designs that fail to a safe state, as these plants like all things made by man will have failures. Chernobyl and Fukushima and Three Mile Island were nasty fails and are in the public mind.

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts