99 Comments
User's avatar
Ben's avatar

Thank you for doing this.

Expand full comment
Emmette Pilgreen's avatar

One more great Orwell quote from 1984 that I also believes echos the reality of our current societal dynamics:

“Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football, beer, and above all, gambling filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult…. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary to make them accept longer working hours or shorter rations. And when they became discontented, as they sometimes did, their discontentment led nowhere, because being without general ideas, they could only focus it on petty specific grievances.”

Expand full comment
James DiPoto's avatar

Excellent piece!

“The American Dream didn’t get more expensive. It became structurally impossible. This isn’t a future scenario. This is now. This happened through decades of bad management and weak choices. Each choice seemed reasonable in isolation. Together they created systematic impossibility. No ideology. Just math. And math is dangerous because it proves the decline is real – not imagined, not nostalgic, not entitled. Real.” This is EXACTLY RIGHT!

As retired baby boomers (both engineers), my wife and I agree that our generation was the last to realize the “American Dream.” We purchased our first home for 1.8x my (sole) gross income at that time. By 30 years old, we had two children and my wife had chosen to quit working in engineering and stay home to raise our children (ultimately 3 sons + 2 daughters). I worked hard to provide for the family, but life was very good. Unfortunately, our children don’t enjoy the America that we had. In the early ‘80’s when I graduated from a state university (with zero student loan debt), America was still a manufacturing powerhouse – and that made a lucrative engineering career possible. In addition, legal and illegal immigration were strictly limited, so our salaries and hourly labor rates weren’t being intentionally squeezed.

The biggest changes during my career happened after the NAFTA and GATT treaties were signed and China was allowed to enter the WTO. That’s when corporations were incentivized to offshore manufacturing to China and elsewhere. Between 1997 and 2020, more than 90,000 factories were closed within the United States – and that was devastating to the American people (everywhere, but especially in the Heartland). My children (all Millennials) are exceptional people – highly educated professionals working in their chosen fields, but none of them are homeowners and they struggle with the cost of living. It’s appalling.

There are two things that I would add to your list of bad management and weak choices:

1. Offshoring the manufacturing of goods, and replacing it with debt expansion.

2. Elimination of “defined benefit” pension plans – especially for blue collar workers. Replacement with 401-K plans that drive the “passive flows” of today’s markets.

I really do admire your decision to address the problems in our political system. It’s my opinion that we’re too late in the “Fourth Turning” for this approach to resolve our problems. I suspect that we’re heading for an incredibly bad socio-economic crisis, greater than anything our nation has seen since its founding. My goal is to prepare for this kind of scenario and be ready to offer aid to my adult children and extended family. And pray.

Expand full comment
MX's avatar

I'm in engineering now, and it's a stark difference to what you describe

Expand full comment
Michael W. Green's avatar

I’d love to understand your perspective

Expand full comment
uhh yeah's avatar

I'm what ways?

Expand full comment
Jackie Daytona's avatar

Mike, I’m 36 and I’ve spent the last 15 years digging a wealth advisory firm out of the dirt with my own hands. We’re approaching a billion in assets now, and I’m proud of what we’ve built, but I need to say something most people in my position won’t say.

I’m the anomaly in my generation.

My story isn’t normal.

My outcome isn’t something I can honestly tell younger people to replicate.

I sit across from real families every day and watch them struggle against math that simply doesn’t work anymore. They feel the squeeze even when they’re doing everything right. And your writing is the first thing I’ve read that actually reflects the reality I see on the ground. You articulated what I’ve been carrying in my gut for a long time.

You’ve pushed me to speak more honestly, and you’ve made me seriously consider stepping into a bigger arena because sitting quietly while the floor erodes under the next generation feels wrong.

If you’re open to it, I’d genuinely appreciate the chance to connect. I think we’re wrestling with a lot of the same truths, and I respect your work more than you know.

Expand full comment
Michael W. Green's avatar

I would be happy to

Expand full comment
Jackie Daytona's avatar

Thanks, Mike. I appreciate that.

What’s the easiest way for us to connect?

Whenever the timing works, I’d value a real conversation

Expand full comment
Michael W. Green's avatar

DM me here or Twitter

Expand full comment
Jackie Daytona's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Paul Watkins's avatar

Living on the other side of the Atlantic, my answer is a straightforward “no, I’m not an American” but I have always been an optimist about America. It’s a country founded on the principle of being run by the people and for the people - which for generations has seemed like an attractive proposition for people suffering hardship in Europe.

As someone interested in economic history I have always been fascinated by the economic expansion that took place in the US starting in the summer of 1940 (18 months before Pearl Harbour), when an enormous spending bill was passed to effectively double the size of the US navy. With the fall of France the US Congress realised the imminent danger of war in the Pacific & Atlantic at the same time.

What is astonishing is how quickly a country that had been mired in the Great Depression suddenly sprang to life and managed to build not just ships but planes in numbers that were unimaginable just a few years earlier.

Millions of Americans who had been unemployed or underemployed in the South or rural areas migrated North and West to take up the factory work suddenly available. Many had never earned such high and regular wages before. Many became tax payers for the first time.

All this activity meant that the economy expanded rapidly, full employment was achieved, war time rationing meant that a lot of income was saved in war bonds which helped to continue the expansion when the war ended. What about all the debt? Well at least people knew where the money went - they had won the war.

All of this was a huge vindication of Keynes thinking, in the sense that unless all the machines in a factory are running 24 hours a day, and everyone who wants to work is working, then you can always do better. The United States is an astonishingly well endowed country, with more coastline, rivers, farmland and minerals than anywhere else on earth. It just seems to have had bad luck with its politicians recently.

The great safety valve is a federal structure where powerful states like California can power ahead in technology or creative industries while Washington is ineffective. There is nothing that America can’t do (build the Hoover dam, the B29 bomber, an atom bomb, walk on the Moon, create the iPhone). So much anxiety and stress for young people seems to revolve around housing, the Financial Times in London seems to be suggesting that treating property as an investment asset rather than as a home is an issue which should be looked at. Perhaps there is an idea there.

Expand full comment
Chronos's avatar

Many government programs were set up in the past to make housing affordable for many. VA, FHA, USDA mortgages with low down payment requirements. 30 year fixed mortgages. GSEs that sponsored these loans and more. With the financialization of housing the opposite effect has taken place.

Expand full comment
Sergey Alexashenko's avatar

Great piece. FWIW, the entire Democratic establishment is talking about this paper https://decidingtowin.org which states that they should focus on cost of living issues (though no concrete policy proposals).

Personally, I don't think we have the time for any kind of systemic economic reform until we run into the wall at full speed on the fiscal front.

Maybe it's being in Silicon Valley but my current read is "explosive economic growth from AGI or bust".

Expand full comment
Dagny's avatar

Great rant! I (old boomer) agree with most of your points. I'd simplify your math though, to one word INFLATION. Didn't Lenin (1st Soviet Union dictator for those uneducated in history) say the way to destroy capitalism is by debasing the currency?

Expand full comment
Marco Colasacco's avatar

Thank you for another amazing article. We are currently working on what we believe to be a solution, that would empower the American people. Would love to share it with you when the time is right.

Expand full comment
Michael W. Green's avatar

Please do. Dm on Twitter is apparently easiest

Expand full comment
Marco Colasacco's avatar

Thank you Mike. I believe you have to follow me back on X so that I may send you a DM. My handle is @colasaccomar

Expand full comment
BananaSam's avatar

Fantastic post, Mike—smart, nuanced, compassionate. Also a fellow Racket book reader I gather. Thanks for this—much food for thought.

(And you didn't rail against BTC once, which means your IQ wasn't immediately halved! Seriously, your comments on crypto aren't going to age well. But that's another topic...)

Expand full comment
Sully's avatar

This is a wonderful read. Thank you Mike.

Expand full comment
HHH's avatar

Mike - thank you for this. You’ve made me a paid subscriber. I fully support what you wrote and commend you for the call to action.

I think it would be great to have Mandani on. Everything I know about him is that he’s a well intentioned, good faith guy and is willing to be open and talk to anyone who can help tackle the affordability crisis in NYC.

And I think as an accomplished finance and intellectual heavyweight like yourself , and from a differing background, it

Will be great for you guys to talk and trade ideas.

I don’t know Mandani directly but I’m

Part of the greater NJ Muslim community and I am can try to get in contact with someone who knows him. Please let me know if you would be interested

Expand full comment
Michael W. Green's avatar

Please do. I would love that

Expand full comment
Jonathan Petersen's avatar

Great article and inspiring conclusion. I have a friend (fellow mid-30s Millennial) who is early in considering running for office in Florida. Will reach out if he moves forward with that.

Expand full comment
Michael W. Green's avatar

Please encourage him and have him reach out

Expand full comment
Jonathan Petersen's avatar

I'll reach out to a few people. Hopefully will have at least one for you to speak to. We'll be in touch. Much appreciation for this initiative!

Expand full comment
Andrew Chang's avatar

Great piece. I’m starting to detect a theme between your recent pieces and your passive critique: firstly we, as a society, crowd around some local maxima (rationally, on the individual level). We mold society and regulations around this new found demand and end up ruining the market mechanism entirely (we also realize the local maxima isn’t worth maximizing in the first place, ie the college degree is worthless. The signal of the college filtering process is valuable. Begin to hand out too many degrees and the signal ceases to exist).

Is the “true issue” more of the former, or the latter? Is the issue that we tend to crowd (social media and tv probably have a large role to play) or that we so willfully mold our governments and society towards these local maxima (a deeper conservative critique)

Expand full comment
NATEture’s Domain's avatar

Why not run for office yourself? Got my vote.

Expand full comment
Michael W. Green's avatar

Worst choice ever. But thank you.

Expand full comment
Gianpaolo Uribe's avatar

That's why we rarely get good people though 😭

Expand full comment
Cliogenes73's avatar

Thinking the same thing myself!

Expand full comment
Andrew Sinclair's avatar

Michael, I thought last week blew me away, and now this!

Your breakdown of the property tax arithmetic is devastating proof: it’s not "entitlement," it’s a systematic extraction. I really enjoyed how perfectly nailed the Orwellian Dynamic: the promise to "own nothing" is enforced through the "Mockery Machine." We are being told to accept precarity as patriotism, while the original promise of abundance for hard work is withdrawn. We have to get our level playing field back and re-price that option. Thank you for framing the fight with such clarity and thank you for taking it back to 'them'!

Expand full comment
Emmette Pilgreen's avatar

When I was in in high school and college, I read both Animal Farm and 1984; and also some Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. At the time, being the Gen X patriot I viewed myself as, I thought those writings were about what President Reagan called the "Evil Empire". Now in my late 50s and comfortably in the top 10% economically, I see that those writings were about all humans. Your post last week and this week strike a chord in discussions I have with my children. They struggle seeing that hope in America that I grasped as a young adult. I agree with you that a restoration of Hope is needed so that my children and grandchildren can have a fair shot an opportunity.

Corruption in the system is running ever deeper with each passing generation. President Trump's son is an advisor to Kalshi prediction markets. Kalshi describes itself it's products as "investments" and many youth are lured to it in hopes of making quick money. I just scratch my head and observe: it's gambling pure and simple - how can anyone say it's investing. And of course any gambling operation is going to give birth to more corruption.

Mamdani, Trump and along with the "progressives" on both sides (and most establishment politicians) are cut from the same clothe. They want to maintain grievances (often petty, illusory or both)among the masses of society. Very few politicians today have any desire to solve problems and restore hope: it is about keeping the grievances fired up. No President ever used political power to ensconce abortion rights in legislative protections. No President ever used political power to ensconce rational immigration and guest worker reform in legislation. Presidents and most politicians are becoming increasingly corrupt and milking the system for their personal gains. I fear this spiral leads to a dictatorship (it could be from the left or the right) and a collapse of democracy in the United States. As you say the restoration of Hope and individual agency to rise or fall on genuine work and merit must be restored. The dignity of the individual must be maintained by the government and earned by the individual.

Your idea of spotlighting politicians who address these issues is a good one. Both political parties will demonize them and eat their own: think Sen. Fetterman, think Sen. Paul. We need a Marcus Aurelius type to emerge rather than a dictator from the far right or left.

Great writing as always!

Expand full comment
Blue Eagle Energy's avatar

I don't know that corruption is really anything new, you can go all the way back to the founders and find they weren't above making choices that benefited themselves personally.

I think the difference today is the corruption is entirely unproductive, at least when Union Pacific bought off politicians for subsidies, we at least got a rail system out of the deal.

Modern corruption is less constructive but makes most of its money by being obstructive.

That it will take likely longer to rebuild the Francis Scott key bridge now then it took to build it originally is not a bug but a feature of a system that works to employ people in busy work.

the net effect is a more insidious less visible form of corruption in which billions of dollars are spent but no highspeed rail gets build as in the case of California. What we are quick to excuse as incompetence and bureaucracy is really a product designed not to work.

Expand full comment